- Wed Sep 25, 2019 12:58 am
#20954
Actually,
my question is related to the Monitor that executes the triggers and display the answers on this tab.
Considering that we are using one tool projected to optimize the time and processing, there is one thing that I really can't understand, and I really want to receive a clear explanation about how this works.
Besides that, I can't understand why everybody just accepts the way the tool works nowadays, it can't be only me that thinks in this way.
Here we go:
1)Considering that I already filtered on my actual strategy that I will work only with Match Odds, why the Reports(Monitor) must read each event and consequently all games related to all events that are not related to my actual strategy ?
this looks insane to me.
Some specialists say that this read doesn't take much time, but this isn't true.
We don't need to measure, to notice the overload of time and processing.
2)Isn't possible to use a flag, to inform wich markets should be monitored and reported on the Results Tab?
3)if the monitor had performed the same read to all strategy, this could be a reason for not use a flag to specify the market by strategy. But this is not the case, because we can see the monitor working individually for each strategy.
While my strategy A is validating Event Filter
The Strategy B is is validating in-play statistics
So, there is no need to load all events on all strategies' Monitors(Results tab)
I wish I could find at least one user that thinks like me, to convince me that I'm not crazy.
ps: Please do not post any article, because I'm pretty sure the answer for this redundancy on validating the events that are not part of my strategy is not explained on any post.
The only info the monitor should have is: the market that I will work with it... and not all markets that he must not work with it.
my question is related to the Monitor that executes the triggers and display the answers on this tab.
Considering that we are using one tool projected to optimize the time and processing, there is one thing that I really can't understand, and I really want to receive a clear explanation about how this works.
Besides that, I can't understand why everybody just accepts the way the tool works nowadays, it can't be only me that thinks in this way.
Here we go:
1)Considering that I already filtered on my actual strategy that I will work only with Match Odds, why the Reports(Monitor) must read each event and consequently all games related to all events that are not related to my actual strategy ?
this looks insane to me.
Some specialists say that this read doesn't take much time, but this isn't true.
We don't need to measure, to notice the overload of time and processing.
2)Isn't possible to use a flag, to inform wich markets should be monitored and reported on the Results Tab?
3)if the monitor had performed the same read to all strategy, this could be a reason for not use a flag to specify the market by strategy. But this is not the case, because we can see the monitor working individually for each strategy.
While my strategy A is validating Event Filter
The Strategy B is is validating in-play statistics
So, there is no need to load all events on all strategies' Monitors(Results tab)
I wish I could find at least one user that thinks like me, to convince me that I'm not crazy.
ps: Please do not post any article, because I'm pretty sure the answer for this redundancy on validating the events that are not part of my strategy is not explained on any post.
The only info the monitor should have is: the market that I will work with it... and not all markets that he must not work with it.
